32 Loading ParametersI have little or no knowledge of the loading parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. I either don't have a set way of coaching things, or I borrowed a method from another coach. I can't readily articulate why I do what I do, I just do it. I tend not to know what it is I am looking for when athletes make errors, and I am extremely unsure about how to correct them if at all. I have decent but not strong knowledge of the loading parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. My understanding and communication of the technical model of all movements I coach is rudimentary, but I struggle to say why I do what I do sometimes. I am inconsistent in my ability to detect errors or resolve them with coaching interventions. It can sometimes take weeks or months. I have good but not great knowledge of the loading parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. I can understand and communicate well the technical model of all movements I coach, but I sometimes lack consistency or understanding of the scientific underpinnings. I have a good "coach's eye", but I could be faster at detecting errors or iron them out with targeted interventions. I have very in depth knowledge of the loading parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. I intimately understand and can communicate thoroughly the technical model of all movements I coach, including their scientific underpinnings. I am confident in my "coach's eye" and I am quick to both identify errors and correct them with targeted interventions.
33 SpeedI have little or no knowledge of speed training parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. I either don't have a set way of coaching things, or I borrowed a method from another coach. I can't readily articulate why I do what I do, I just do it. I tend not to know what it is I am looking for when athletes make errors, and I am extremely unsure about how to correct them if at all. I have decent but not strong knowledge of speed training parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. My understanding and communication of the technical model of all movements I coach is rudimentary, but I struggle to say why I do what I do sometimes. I am inconsistent in my ability to detect errors or resolve them with coaching interventions. It can sometimes take weeks or months. I have good but not great knowledge of speed training parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. I can understand and communicate well the technical model of all movements I coach, but I sometimes lack consistency or understanding of the scientific underpinnings. I have a good "coach's eye", but I could be faster at detecting errors or iron them out with targeted interventions. I have very in depth knowledge of speed training parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. I intimately understand and can communicate thoroughly the technical model of all movements I coach, including their scientific underpinnings. I am confident in my "coach's eye" and I am quick to both identify errors and correct them with targeted interventions.
34 AgilityI have little or no knowledge of agility parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. I either don't have a set way of coaching things, or I borrowed a method from another coach. I can't readily articulate why I do what I do, I just do it. I tend not to know what it is I am looking for when athletes make errors, and I am extremely unsure about how to correct them if at all. I have decent but not strong knowledge of agility parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. My understanding and communication of the technical model of all movements I coach is rudimentary, but I struggle to say why I do what I do sometimes. I am inconsistent in my ability to detect errors or resolve them with coaching interventions. It can sometimes take weeks or months. I have good but not great knowledge of agility parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. I can understand and communicate well the technical model of all movements I coach, but I sometimes lack consistency or understanding of the scientific underpinnings. I have a good "coach's eye", but I could be faster at detecting errors or iron them out with targeted interventions. I have very in depth knowledge of agility parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. I intimately understand and can communicate thoroughly the technical model of all movements I coach, including their scientific underpinnings. I am confident in my "coach's eye" and I am quick to both identify errors and correct them with targeted interventions.
35 Jumps and PlyometricsI have little or no knowledge of jumps and plyometric parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. I either don't have a set way of coaching things, or I borrowed a method from another coach. I can't readily articulate why I do what I do, I just do it. I tend not to know what it is I am looking for when athletes make errors, and I am extremely unsure about how to correct them if at all. I have decent but not strong knowledge of jumps and plyometric parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. My understanding and communication of the technical model of all movements I coach is rudimentary, but I struggle to say why I do what I do sometimes. I am inconsistent in my ability to detect errors or resolve them with coaching interventions. It can sometimes take weeks or months. I have good but not great knowledge of jumps and plyometric parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. I can understand and communicate well the technical model of all movements I coach, but I sometimes lack consistency or understanding of the scientific underpinnings. I have a good "coach's eye", but I could be faster at detecting errors or iron them out with targeted interventions. I have very in depth knowledge of jumps and plyometric parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. I intimately understand and can communicate thoroughly the technical model of all movements I coach, including their scientific underpinnings. I am confident in my "coach's eye" and I am quick to both identify errors and correct them with targeted interventions.
36 Medicine Ball ThrowsI have little or no knowledge of medicine ball parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. I either don't have a set way of coaching things, or I borrowed a method from another coach. I can't readily articulate why I do what I do, I just do it. I tend not to know what it is I am looking for when athletes make errors, and I am extremely unsure about how to correct them if at all. I have decent but not strong knowledge of medicine ball parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. My understanding and communication of the technical model of all movements I coach is rudimentary, but I struggle to say why I do what I do sometimes. I am inconsistent in my ability to detect errors or resolve them with coaching interventions. It can sometimes take weeks or months. I have good but not great knowledge of medicine ball parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. I can understand and communicate well the technical model of all movements I coach, but I sometimes lack consistency or understanding of the scientific underpinnings. I have a good "coach's eye", but I could be faster at detecting errors or iron them out with targeted interventions. I have very in depth knowledge of medicine ball parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. I intimately understand and can communicate thoroughly the technical model of all movements I coach, including their scientific underpinnings. I am confident in my "coach's eye" and I am quick to both identify errors and correct them with targeted interventions.
37 Ballistic PowerI have little or no knowledge of power parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. I either don't have a set way of coaching things, or I borrowed a method from another coach. I can't readily articulate why I do what I do, I just do it. I tend not to know what it is I am looking for when athletes make errors, and I am extremely unsure about how to correct them if at all. I have decent but not strong knowledge of power parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. My understanding and communication of the technical model of all movements I coach is rudimentary, but I struggle to say why I do what I do sometimes. I am inconsistent in my ability to detect errors or resolve them with coaching interventions. It can sometimes take weeks or months. I have good but not great knowledge of power parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. I can understand and communicate well the technical model of all movements I coach, but I sometimes lack consistency or understanding of the scientific underpinnings. I have a good "coach's eye", but I could be faster at detecting errors or iron them out with targeted interventions. I have very in depth knowledge of power parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. I intimately understand and can communicate thoroughly the technical model of all movements I coach, including their scientific underpinnings. I am confident in my "coach's eye" and I am quick to both identify errors and correct them with targeted interventions.
38 StrengthI have little or no knowledge of strength parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. I either don't have a set way of coaching things, or I borrowed a method from another coach. I can't readily articulate why I do what I do, I just do it. I tend not to know what it is I am looking for when athletes make errors, and I am extremely unsure about how to correct them if at all. I have decent but not strong knowledge of strength parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. My understanding and communication of the technical model of all movements I coach is rudimentary, but I struggle to say why I do what I do sometimes. I am inconsistent in my ability to detect errors or resolve them with coaching interventions. It can sometimes take weeks or months. I have good but not great knowledge of strength parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. I can understand and communicate well the technical model of all movements I coach, but I sometimes lack consistency or understanding of the scientific underpinnings. I have a good "coach's eye", but I could be faster at detecting errors or iron them out with targeted interventions. I have very in depth knowledge of strength parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. I intimately understand and can communicate thoroughly the technical model of all movements I coach, including their scientific underpinnings. I am confident in my "coach's eye" and I am quick to both identify errors and correct them with targeted interventions.
39 ConditioningI have little or no knowledge of conditioning parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. I either don't have a set way of coaching things, or I borrowed a method from another coach. I can't readily articulate why I do what I do, I just do it. I tend not to know what it is I am looking for when athletes make errors, and I am extremely unsure about how to correct them if at all. I have decent but not strong knowledge of conditioning parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. My understanding and communication of the technical model of all movements I coach is rudimentary, but I struggle to say why I do what I do sometimes. I am inconsistent in my ability to detect errors or resolve them with coaching interventions. It can sometimes take weeks or months. I have good but not great knowledge of conditioning parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. I can understand and communicate well the technical model of all movements I coach, but I sometimes lack consistency or understanding of the scientific underpinnings. I have a good "coach's eye", but I could be faster at detecting errors or iron them out with targeted interventions. I have very in depth knowledge of conditioning parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. I intimately understand and can communicate thoroughly the technical model of all movements I coach, including their scientific underpinnings. I am confident in my "coach's eye" and I am quick to both identify errors and correct them with targeted interventions.
40 Movement efficiencyI have little or no knowledge of movement parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. I either don't have a set way of coaching things, or I borrowed a method from another coach. I can't readily articulate why I do what I do, I just do it. I tend not to know what it is I am looking for when athletes make errors, and I am extremely unsure about how to correct them if at all. I have decent but not strong knowledge of movement parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. My understanding and communication of the technical model of all movements I coach is rudimentary, but I struggle to say why I do what I do sometimes. I am inconsistent in my ability to detect errors or resolve them with coaching interventions. It can sometimes take weeks or months. I have good but not great knowledge of movement parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. I can understand and communicate well the technical model of all movements I coach, but I sometimes lack consistency or understanding of the scientific underpinnings. I have a good "coach's eye", but I could be faster at detecting errors or iron them out with targeted interventions. I have very in depth knowledge of movement parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. I intimately understand and can communicate thoroughly the technical model of all movements I coach, including their scientific underpinnings. I am confident in my "coach's eye" and I am quick to both identify errors and correct them with targeted interventions.
41 Long Term Return to Play (RTP)I have little or no knowledge of RTP parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. I either don't have a set way of coaching things, or I borrowed a method from another coach. I can't readily articulate why I do what I do, I just do it. I tend not to know what it is I am looking for when athletes make errors, and I am extremely unsure about how to correct them if at all. I have decent but not strong knowledge of RTP parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. My understanding and communication of the technical model of all movements I coach is rudimentary, but I struggle to say why I do what I do sometimes. I am inconsistent in my ability to detect errors or resolve them with coaching interventions. It can sometimes take weeks or months. I have good but not great knowledge of RTP parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. I can understand and communicate well the technical model of all movements I coach, but I sometimes lack consistency or understanding of the scientific underpinnings. I have a good "coach's eye", but I could be faster at detecting errors or iron them out with targeted interventions. I have very in depth knowledge of RTP parameters and progressions, regressions, and lateralizations of what I am coaching. I intimately understand and can communicate thoroughly the technical model of all movements I coach, including their scientific underpinnings. I am confident in my "coach's eye" and I am quick to both identify errors and correct them with targeted interventions.